JMS, not JMX.
On 30 March 2014 13:11, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > What JaveEE APIs? JMX was moved to Java SE in 1.5 and 1.6. > > I’m not sure I like the mbeans registering automatically but oh well. > > Ralph > > On Mar 30, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Since JMS depends on Java EE APIs, it would make sense to place them in > their own packages similar to how the db code is handled. I know they work > fine as is, but it makes it easier to segregate optional dependencies. This > would be useful for OSGi so that we can use the full set of metadata > available without requiring all the optional dependencies in the > Import-Package attribute. > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
