Oops, sorry. Ralph
> On Mar 30, 2014, at 11:16 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > JMS, not JMX. > > >> On 30 March 2014 13:11, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> What JaveEE APIs? JMX was moved to Java SE in 1.5 and 1.6. >> >> I’m not sure I like the mbeans registering automatically but oh well. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Mar 30, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Since JMS depends on Java EE APIs, it would make sense to place them in >>> their own packages similar to how the db code is handled. I know they work >>> fine as is, but it makes it easier to segregate optional dependencies. This >>> would be useful for OSGi so that we can use the full set of metadata >>> available without requiring all the optional dependencies in the >>> Import-Package attribute. >>> >>> -- >>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
