That's exactly what I was thinking. I've just been procrastinating.
On 27 May 2014 18:40, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me that we should get rid of SensitivePluginAttribute in favor > of adding an optional "sensitive" or "secret" attribute to > SensitivePluginAttribute. > > Otherwise, we need to duplicate all of the recent add-ons to > PluginAttribute into SensitivePluginAttribute. > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
