Personally I'd like to work on some new features. Specifically, binary logging, a memory-mapped file appender and providing configuration support for some system properties (async loggers, JMX).
So I'd like to work towards a 2.1 release. As you said, if some critical bug pops up we can branch off the 2.0.1 tag, and do a fix on that branch. Sent from my iPhone > On 2014/08/05, at 9:10, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are there any outstanding issues we'd like to address in a 2.0.2 release, or > should we just start working toward 2.1 now instead? Because if we go the 2.1 > route of focus, I've got a few branches to merge back together (thankfully, > git-svn will help a lot in that regard) into trunk. > > As Ralph (IIRC) pointed out, we don't need to make an explicit 2.0 branch > since we can just branch from the 2.0.1 tag itself if necessary. > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
