A cursory look makes me think this is a much simpler framework than Log4j. I 
also can't seem to find the license for it but it seems like it is a commercial 
product.

Ralph

> On Aug 4, 2014, at 6:49 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> http://www.coralblocks.com/index.php/2014/06/corallog-vs-log4j-latency-comparison/
> 
> 
>> On 4 August 2014 20:39, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Do you have a link?
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 2014/08/05, at 10:28, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Gmail is telling me about some other framework that is "18x less latency 
>>> than Log4J 2.0". I'm surprised that the ads are already out like that! 
>>> Looks like competition, guys. ;)
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 4 August 2014 20:24, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> It seems that there are some fixes and pending bugs since we started the 
>>>> 2.0.1 vote that would justify a 2.0.2. Then we could do 2.1. My feeling is 
>>>> that our priority should be to fix 2.0.x as much as possible before adding 
>>>> more features for a 2.1. IOW, let's stabilize the current features in 
>>>> 2.0.x, then add complexity and possible bugs with new features.
>>>> 
>>>> Gary
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Are there any outstanding issues we'd like to address in a 2.0.2 release, 
>>>>> or should we just start working toward 2.1 now instead? Because if we go 
>>>>> the 2.1 route of focus, I've got a few branches to merge back together 
>>>>> (thankfully, git-svn will help a lot in that regard) into trunk.
>>>>> 
>>>>> As Ralph (IIRC) pointed out, we don't need to make an explicit 2.0 branch 
>>>>> since we can just branch from the 2.0.1 tag itself if necessary.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to