Just FYI, someone just asked for log4j-iostreams functionality on Stackoverflow <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26318295/write-system-out-to-file-with-log4j2/26320693#26320693>.
I realize this is easy for me to say, but shall we release 2.1? On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > I looked at the commit emails for the recent changes but nothing caught my > eye; i'm fine with releasing what we have now. > > FYI, I started a number of online courses and may have very little time to > work on log4j for the next month or two. > > Regards, -Remko > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2014/10/07, at 4:33, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Not here. > > Gary > > On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > >> That's what I mean. Any more polishing? Any APIs you forgot to fix before >> 2.1 that can be done in a couple hours or so? That sort of thing. >> >> On 6 October 2014 13:11, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I do not think we should add _anything_ for 2.1. If I have an itch >>> before 2.1 I'll create a branch. Ideally, our time should be spent >>> polishing. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I should have time to start the release again (most likely tonight), >>>> but if there's anything else we want to get in for 2.1, then I may have to >>>> step down. >>>> >>>> On 6 October 2014 12:49, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If Matt is not available I will have the time this week to do a >>>>> release. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Thanks to Matt's RM and coding efforts over the weekend, we went >>>>> through three RCs and found and resolved a slew of issues. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Matt once again. >>>>> >>>>> It looks like Matt added the shutdown hook he had discussed and other >>>>> OSGi related changes. My Apache time is quite limited this week so if >>>>> anyone else can spend some time on reviewing and polishing 2.1, now is the >>>>> time. >>>>> >>>>> While the ML and Jira are active with new messages and tickets, it >>>>> still feels like pushing for 2.1 ASAP is the right thing to do, pending >>>>> Matt's availability. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > >
