I thought Matt was going to do this. I am not sure what happened. Ralph
On Oct 11, 2014, at 5:47 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > Just FYI, someone just asked for log4j-iostreams functionality on > Stackoverflow. > I realize this is easy for me to say, but shall we release 2.1? > > On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 7:19 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > I looked at the commit emails for the recent changes but nothing caught my > eye; i'm fine with releasing what we have now. > > FYI, I started a number of online courses and may have very little time to > work on log4j for the next month or two. > > Regards, -Remko > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 2014/10/07, at 4:33, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Not here. >> >> Gary >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> That's what I mean. Any more polishing? Any APIs you forgot to fix before >> 2.1 that can be done in a couple hours or so? That sort of thing. >> >> On 6 October 2014 13:11, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> I do not think we should add _anything_ for 2.1. If I have an itch before >> 2.1 I'll create a branch. Ideally, our time should be spent polishing. >> >> Gary >> >> On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >> I should have time to start the release again (most likely tonight), but if >> there's anything else we want to get in for 2.1, then I may have to step >> down. >> >> On 6 October 2014 12:49, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> If Matt is not available I will have the time this week to do a release. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Oct 6, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks to Matt's RM and coding efforts over the weekend, we went through >>> three RCs and found and resolved a slew of issues. >>> >>> Thanks Matt once again. >>> >>> It looks like Matt added the shutdown hook he had discussed and other OSGi >>> related changes. My Apache time is quite limited this week so if anyone >>> else can spend some time on reviewing and polishing 2.1, now is the time. >>> >>> While the ML and Jira are active with new messages and tickets, it still >>> feels like pushing for 2.1 ASAP is the right thing to do, pending Matt's >>> availability. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> >> -- >> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >> >> >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
