Or, I guess, when one of these surveys shows Java 6 is down below 10%. Neither of these is extremely current, but it is interesting to note that the second showed Java 6’s usage actually increase over the last several months. I can’t imagine why that would be. http://adtmag.com/blogs/watersworks/2014/05/2014-java-survey.aspx <http://adtmag.com/blogs/watersworks/2014/05/2014-java-survey.aspx> http://blog.jelastic.com/2014/05/20/software-stacks-market-share-april-2014/ <http://blog.jelastic.com/2014/05/20/software-stacks-market-share-april-2014/>
FWIW, I am still using Java 6 at work for some things so I have no interest in not being able to use Log4j 2 in them. They should all be upgraded in the next few months. Ralph > On Nov 30, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > > November 2015. > > Ralph > >> On Nov 30, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> I just had to do some refactoring to account for not being able to use a >> Java 7 multi-catch. >> >> I would be OK to release 2.2 ASAP and then make Java 7 the minimum to take >> advantage to Java 7 features like multi-catch and try-with resources. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
