Hm, one of those blog shows Java 7 ~ 80 % and Java 6 at ~20 %. That fits the general 80/20 rule for me ;-)
Gary On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 12:58 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Or, I guess, when one of these surveys shows Java 6 is down below 10%. > Neither of these is extremely current, but it is interesting to note that > the second showed Java 6’s usage actually increase over the last several > months. I can’t imagine why that would be. > http://adtmag.com/blogs/watersworks/2014/05/2014-java-survey.aspx > > http://blog.jelastic.com/2014/05/20/software-stacks-market-share-april-2014/ > > FWIW, I am still using Java 6 at work for some things so I have no > interest in not being able to use Log4j 2 in them. They should all be > upgraded in the next few months. > > Ralph > > > On Nov 30, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > > November 2015. > > Ralph > > On Nov 30, 2014, at 10:12 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > I just had to do some refactoring to account for not being able to use a > Java 7 multi-catch. > > I would be OK to release 2.2 ASAP and then make Java 7 the minimum to take > advantage to Java 7 features like multi-catch and try-with resources. > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
