Seems reasonable.
Ralph
> On Sep 14, 2015, at 12:35 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> OK, I updated checkstyle with HidddenFields.
>
> Next, I'd like LineLength to be ignored for import statements.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Gary
>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>> Actually, I am fine with setters that do that as well. Both can be
>> configured to be OK with the HiddenField element.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Sep 11, 2015, at 5:22 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Checkstyle complains about code like this:
>>>
>>> private final int foo;
>>> Ctor(int foo) {
>>> this.foo = foo;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Which is perfectly acceptable IMO.
>>>
>>> I really do not see the point of renaming all param names in a ctor.
>>>
>>> In a normal method, yes, you do not want to 'hide' an ivar with a pname.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
