Guido, Did you try using different waiting strategies of LMAX before trying JCTools ?
Regards, Sampath On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Guido Medina <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm wondering if anyone would be willing to test the current LMAX > implementation vs JCTools specifically using the following class: > > I currently use them with Akka mailboxes, I tried LMAX once but with some > CPUs LMAX disruptor was behaving a bit weird which is why I prefer > Lamport's implementations of circular buffers that are very well known and > in use by Netty, Akka, etc. > > Or I could try and contribute by changing the LMAX for JCTools: > > JCtools-core dependency: > > <dependency> > <groupId>org.jctools</groupId> > <artifactId>jctools-core</artifactId> > <version>1.1</version> > </dependency> > > Specific class that would replace LMAX disruptor: > https://github.com/JCTools/JCTools/blob/master/jctools-core/src/main/java/org/jctools/queues/MpscArrayQueue.java > > Best regards, > > Guido. > -- Regards, Sampath
