I have both configured, for akka internal logging I'm using akka-log4j
extension:

https://github.com/hseeberger/akka-log4j

so that akka internal logging still uses my Log4j2 config but in my code
I'm using *LogManager.getLogger(...)* and for other APIs that rely on Slf4j
I have the jar bridge to Log4j2.
I'm using a RollingRandomAccessFile with all asynchronous appenders
including root.

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Are you using Log4j together with Akka? Do you use the Log4j API directly,
> or through Akka's actor logging framework?
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Guido Medina <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I'm wondering if anyone would be willing to test the current LMAX
>> implementation vs JCTools specifically using the following class:
>>
>> I currently use them with Akka mailboxes, I tried LMAX once but with some
>> CPUs LMAX disruptor was behaving a bit weird which is why I prefer
>> Lamport's implementations of circular buffers that are very well known and
>> in use by Netty, Akka, etc.
>>
>> Or I could try and contribute by changing the LMAX for JCTools:
>>
>> JCtools-core dependency:
>>
>> <dependency>
>>     <groupId>org.jctools</groupId>
>>     <artifactId>jctools-core</artifactId>
>>     <version>1.1</version>
>> </dependency>
>>
>> Specific class that would replace LMAX disruptor:
>> https://github.com/JCTools/JCTools/blob/master/jctools-core/src/main/java/org/jctools/queues/MpscArrayQueue.java
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Guido.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> [image: MagineTV]
>
> *Mikael Ståldal*
> Senior software developer
>
> *Magine TV*
> [email protected]
> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>
> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not
> copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
> email.
>

Reply via email to