Then the confusion might be stemming from that along with the fact that
log4j-api and log4j-core are both called "log4j".

On 26 February 2016 at 13:38, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
wrote:

> It more or less was. There was no separation of the API from the impl.
>
> Ralph
>
> On Feb 26, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do people think log4j1 was just an implementation, too?
>
> On 26 February 2016 at 12:18, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-parser/issues/209#issuecomment-189377712
>>
>> What can we do to educate and publicize the fact that Log4j 2 is an API
>> too?
>>
>> Gary
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>
>
>


-- 
Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to