Well, that is understandable. He has been working on this stuff a long time. And I know he wasn’t happy about the documentation issue, even though all that documentation derived from the log4j 1 manual.
Ralph > On Feb 26, 2016, at 2:00 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Yeah, seems a little strong a reply. He sure has a lot of emotion attached to > the issue! > > Gary > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 12:13 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Wow. Ceki sure took offense to that! > > Ralph > >> On Feb 26, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-parser/issues/209#issuecomment-189377712 >> >> <https://github.com/swagger-api/swagger-parser/issues/209#issuecomment-189377712> >> What can we do to educate and publicize the fact that Log4j 2 is an API too? >> >> Gary >> > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> | > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com <http://garygregory.wordpress.com/> > Home: http://garygregory.com/ <http://garygregory.com/> > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory <http://twitter.com/GaryGregory>
