I'm working on the last few remaining things for the LOG4J2-1270 garbage-free epic that I want to include in 2.6:
* Documentation LOG4J2-1297 (todo: performance comparison) * making synchronous logging garbage-free: LOG4J2-1334 (one broken unit test left) * passing message parameters down when logging async LOG4J2-1342. Needed for CSV layout. (initial implementation done, not committed yet, need to add unit tests) Of these the performance test results are most important. Latency/response time tests I still need to figure out how to do correctly. (Phew, almost there! That garbage-free thing was a boatload of work! Now I know why they call these things "epics"...) Sent from my iPhone > On 2016/04/21, at 4:28, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I, too, want to use the StackWalker API, but as it is currently, I don't see > how we can use it without having some classes being compiled against Java 9. > Reflection doesn't look like it'll work too well what with the lambdas unless > we were targeting Java 8. > >> On 20 April 2016 at 13:26, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> I definitely want to leverage the StackWalker API. >> >> Someone recently requested that Logback be compliant with the compact3 >> profile. I took a look and it wouldn’t be a big deal for us to meet that. >> But I am more interested in what the new module system will look like. >> >> Ralph >> >>> On Apr 20, 2016, at 10:50 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, I do not think we need to do anything for JDK9 aside from maybe a >>> branch or a txt doc file with your findings. >>> >>> Gary >>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:32 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> I have nothing in mind that's necessary for 2.6. I've started looking at >>>> some JDK9 stuff, but at the glacial rate JDK9 is being developed, we'll be >>>> several versions ahead before that's relevant. >>>> >>>>> On 20 April 2016 at 12:20, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi Ralph, >>>>> >>>>> I wanted to see about getting the CSV layouts to play in the GC-free >>>>> world. Not critical though. I got some feedback from Remko on that, so I >>>>> think I know what to do... >>>>> >>>>> I'd also like to do a round of testing of the new flow logging APIs in a >>>>> branch for my work code base. This will make sure I've got most if not >>>>> all of my use cases covered. I can't do that today though. Maybe before >>>>> the weekend. >>>>> >>>>> Gary >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Ralph Goers >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> I finally got a chance to fix the two bugs I wanted to get in for 2.6. I >>>>>> am thinking I should be able to do the release this weekend. Is there >>>>>> anything else that must be done before we can release? We have a lot of >>>>>> changes in 2.6 already. >>>>>> >>>>>> Ralph >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>>>> Spring Batch in Action >>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >>> Spring Batch in Action >>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
