On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 8:07 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The "unnecessary parenthesis" rule is somewhat annoying. While it has good
> intentions, it'll also flag something like this:
>
> foo || (bar && baz)
>
> Sure, && has higher precedence than || (had to look it up just now), but
> who can remember those kinds of rules anyways?
>

It's one of the many things Smalltalk got right. Left to right, simple as
that. Different, yes, but simple.

Gary


>
> On 10 February 2017 at 09:36, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 on braces
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 12:35 AM, Apache <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> You don’t really have to use final everywhere. If you don’t, Gary will
>>> fix it ;-)
>>>
>>> Actually, I really do prefer most of our check style rules, but not
>>> enough to yell and scream about it. The one that bothers me the most is
>>> that I want braces wherever they are optional.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Feb 10, 2017, at 8:09 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> At work, I've switched from final everywhere to final everywhere but
>>> local variables while maintaining effective finality instead. I just wish
>>> Java had final be the default.
>>>
>>> On 10 February 2017 at 05:34, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Generally agree except that we agreed that the final qualifier was
>>>> optional.  This may not be easy (or possible?) to verify automatically
>>>> anyway.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise all looks reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 10, 2017, at 17:55, Mikael Ståldal <mikael.stal...@magine.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Seems reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 5:56 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with all that! :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Gary
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 9, 2017 7:05 PM, "Matt Sicker" <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I was browsing through the site and took a look at the component
>>>>> reports. Checkstyle alone seems close to pointless as there are over 200
>>>>> errors in log4j-api alone. log4j-core has over 2000 errors. Even new files
>>>>> that were formatted with our formatter settings such as the
>>>>> CassandraAppender plugin have import ordering errors. I also disagree with
>>>>> some of the rules configured, but that doesn't really matter when we don't
>>>>> enforce it in the first place.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anyways, what's the point of configuring this and adding checkstyle
>>>>> comments yet not even using it? The only project I've come across in the
>>>>> wild so far that has checkstyle configured properly was Spring Boot, and
>>>>> your pull request has to pass the checkstyle check to even be mergeable.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps if we wish to actually use it, we could loosen the rules down
>>>>> to a much smaller set that actually matches the formatter settings in
>>>>> src/ide/. If the rules matched our code base, then we could also have
>>>>> Jenkins run checkstyle checks which would keep us informed when we mess 
>>>>> up,
>>>>> and it would also be useful for pull requests (I've had to reformat many
>>>>> patches in the past).
>>>>>
>>>>> Related, there's the style guide <https://logging.apache.org/lo
>>>>> g4j/2.x/javastyle.html> which I'm pretty sure I've never even looked
>>>>> at before. This could also be normalized with our formatter files. I've
>>>>> generally thought of our code style summarized as:
>>>>>
>>>>> * 4 space indent
>>>>> * use final
>>>>> * no star imports outside tests (and those should generally be static
>>>>> imports)
>>>>> * imports should be in some sort of alphabetical order (this is really
>>>>> difficult to match between IntelliJ and Eclipse for some reason; I've had
>>>>> rather obnoxious fights about this in the past thanks to
>>>>> import-order-induced merge conflicts)
>>>>> * try to stick to unix line endings, but we're rather mixed still
>>>>> * every file needs a license header unless it's impossible to include
>>>>> comments
>>>>> * use CamelCaseClassNames, even for acronyms
>>>>> * no hungarian notation or other distracting naming conventions
>>>>> * otherwise stick to typical Sun style that everyone basically
>>>>> recognizes (that the JDK doesn't even use itself)
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> [image: MagineTV]
>>>>
>>>> *Mikael Ståldal*
>>>> Senior software developer
>>>>
>>>> *Magine TV*
>>>> mikael.stal...@magine.com
>>>> Grev Turegatan 3  | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden  |   www.magine.com
>>>> <http://www.magine.com/>
>>>>
>>>> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this
>>>> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message
>>>> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may
>>>> not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case,
>>>> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply
>>>> email.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>



-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1617290459/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1617290459&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=cadb800f39946ec62ea2b1af9fe6a2b8>

<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1617290459>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182021/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182021&linkCode=as2&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=31ecd1f6b6d1eaf8886ac902a24de418%22>

<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182021>
Spring Batch in Action
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1935182951/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1935182951&linkCode=%7B%7BlinkCode%7D%7D&tag=garygregory-20&linkId=%7B%7Blink_id%7D%7D%22%3ESpring+Batch+in+Action>
<http:////ir-na.amazon-adsystem.com/e/ir?t=garygregory-20&l=am2&o=1&a=1935182951>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to