Ceki,
Did you get my JDBCAppender contribution?
Kevin
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
> Roger,
>
> Thank you for your contribution. However, isn't the JMSLogger just an extension of
>JMSAppender?
>
> I find it upsetting that you have chosen to remove the original author's name (me in
>this case) when most of the code is manifestly copied from JMSAppender. I am not
>claiming that the JMSAppender code is the greatest software ever written. However,
>copying it without giving credit to the original author is unethical. I am very
>careful to grant authorship to contributions over 10 lines. I expect others to do the
>same.
>
> By the way, if anyone has made a contribution without being granted authorship,
>please let me know. I'll correct the omission promptly. Regards, Ceki
>
> ps: I suggest that you supply your contrib as a patch to JMSAppender. Do include
>yourself as an author without deleting the names of previous authors.
>
> At 11:15 07.02.2001 -0800, you wrote:
> >Attached is my modified JMSAppender. Include the following properties in your
>properties/xml file:
> >
> >log4j.appender.A1=com.cj.foundation.log4j.JMSLogger
> >log4j.appender.A1.TopicBindingName=testtopic
> >log4j.appender.A1.TopicConnectionFactoryBindingName=TopicConnectionFactory
> >log4j.appender.A1.InitialContextFactory=com.swiftmq.jndi.InitialContextFactoryImpl
> >log4j.appender.A1.ProviderUrl=smqp://localhost:4001/timeout=10000
> >log4j.appender.A1.TimeToLive=120000
> >
> >The performance tests I've done on the JMS logging shows it is far slower than
>writing to a file. The reason being that the appender does not return until the JMS
>server acknowledges persisting the log message(this assumes using persistence when
>publishing). The logging time for JMS ranged from 10ms to 50ms on a Win2k 650MHz box
>with SwiftMq. We're thinking of using JMS for logging exceptions only and using files
>for tracing and general debug. I'm currently working on a way to log to different
>files for different JVMs. This is necessary for application servers where the same
>application can be run in several JVM on the same box at the same time.
> >
> >Roger
> >
> >
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/05/01 12:42AM >>>
> >Roger Kjensrud wrote:
> >>
> >> I extended the JMSAppender and included the url and the initial context
> >> factory in the config and it works just fine. If there is any interest I can
> >> post the extended JMSAppender for others to use.
> >>
> >> I'm using SwiftMQ, and I notice that the publishing of the LoggingEvent
> >> takes quite a bit longer than for example logging to file. Does anyone else
> >> has any experience with the performance of using the JMSAppender or logging
> >> to JMS in general?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Roger
> >
> >Post it Roger! I would like to see an example configuration on that. Do
> >you have already made any exp with the performance of that?
> >
> >Regards
> >Armin Rauch
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ----
> Ceki Gülcü e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (preferred)
> av. de Rumine 5 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> CH-1005 Lausanne
> Switzerland Tel: ++41 21 351 23 15
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
