What category names are associated with A and SB?
Appender additivity (inheritance) follows the category hierarchy, not the
runtime callstack. Typically, people use the locality convention, naming
categories for the fully qualified name of the class. In that event, if SB
was a decendent of A, such as com.dwl.A and com.dwl.A.SB, then SB would
inherit appenders attached at A (com.dwl.A).
If you don't use locality naming convention, nonetheless, category names
must be descendent in the hierarchy namespace in order to inherit.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sachin Wadhwa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 4:06 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: EJB problem
>
>
> Hi All,
> I have a class called "A" . This class A has a variable cat:category.
> It logs using Fileappender (writes to a file).
> Now A calls a session Bean "SB". This session bean has
> another variable
> SB_cat:category. In one of the methods of SB there is a statement
> SB_cat.warn("I am in Session Bean");
> But this statement is not printed in the file. rather I get the error
> that Appender not attached. Why do I need to attach an appender when I
> allready have BasicConfigurator(appender) in class A.
> Can anyone please suggest how to use log4j in Beans
> THanks
> Sac
>
> --
> Sachin Wadhwa
> Product Developer
> DWL Incorporated
> 230 Richmond Street East Level 2
> Toronto, ON
> M5A 3X9
> T: (416)364-2045 x 2463
> F: (416)364-2422
> www.dwl.com
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
