Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>
> Partially. Nested appenders are closed first, followed by *all* appenders.
>
[snip]
>
> Does that make better sense? Ceki
>
Yup, I see it now, I should have kept reading. Sorry about the
misinformation.
So, back to the original problem, he shouldn't have any problems
overriding the close method, right?
Mike Papper: Why doesn't overriding the close method work?
/mike
--
******************************************
Mike Dougherty -- Java Software Engineer
******************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]