Ceki Gülcü wrote:
>  
> Partially. Nested appenders are closed first, followed by *all* appenders.
> 

[snip]

> 
> Does that make better sense? Ceki
> 

Yup, I see it now, I should have kept reading. Sorry about the
misinformation.

So, back to the original problem, he shouldn't have any problems
overriding the close method, right?

Mike Papper: Why doesn't overriding the close method work?


/mike


-- 
******************************************
 Mike Dougherty -- Java Software Engineer
******************************************

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to