>>This is a misconception that many Java programmers share. It is possible
>to have
>>more than one copy of a static in the same VM. It has to do with multiple
>>classloaders. There's a good paper about this at http://www.javageeks.com
,
>but I
>>can't seem to get to that site today.
>
>you're right... my suggestion wasn't precise enough...
>here the correct one... ;-)
>1 instance per vm per classloader-boundary..
>Err... one instance of what?
one instance of a singleton (or it's static referece...)
Ceki Gülcü
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "LOG4J Users Mailing List"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
10.08.2001 Subject: Re: log4j and J2EE problem
11:33
Please respond
to "LOG4J
Users Mailing
List"
At 11:16 10.08.2001 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>This is a misconception that many Java programmers share. It is possible
>to have
>>more than one copy of a static in the same VM. It has to do with multiple
>>classloaders. There's a good paper about this at http://www.javageeks.com
,
>but I
>>can't seem to get to that site today.
>
>you're right... my suggestion wasn't precise enough...
>here the correct one... ;-)
>1 instance per vm per classloader-boundary..
Err... one instance of what?
--
Ceki Gülcü - http://qos.ch
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
