Jon Certainly be v.interested in what you find out -- Rob Send reply to: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: JDK1.4 Date sent: Mon, 18 Feb 2002 18:53:05 -0000 From: "Jon Skeet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Log4J Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Not specifically Log4J related, but worthy of note. > > > > I'd strongly suggested anyone considering moving up to JDK1.4 > > take a long hard > > look at the following bug (and hopefully vote it up the priority list) > > > > http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4523761.html > > > > I'm lost for words how Sun could release JDK1.4 with such a > > large and obvious > > incompatibility with the Java spec and previous releases. > > It's stopped our > > migration in it's tracks, as I suspect it will a lot of people. > > Before you vote for it to go up the priority list, I suggest you take a good and >*very* hard look at it. I'm investigating it at the moment, but I don't think it *is* >a bug. I believe the submitted hasn't really looked at what's going on properly - >there's a perfectly good reason why the code is recursing (and giving that output) without instanceof being problematic. > > Jon > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > SoftSell Business Systems, Ltd. ' testing solutions for a changing world ' +44 (20) 7488 3470 www.softsell.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
