Can someone please comment on my question below?
thanks,
Jake
Wednesday, July 17, 2002, 3:26:19 PM, you wrote:
JK> Hi,
JK> I have seen some cases where loggers are defined as "public", some as
JK> "protected", some as "private", and some as the default package level
JK> visibility. Along the same lines, I have seen cases where loggers are
JK> defined as "static" and others non-static. I have also seen some
JK> cases where the logger is defined as "final".
JK> What would be the "best practice" here? Would it depend on the
JK> application? Is there an advantage for subclasses to have access to
JK> the parent class logger as those defined as "public" and "protected"
JK> would be visible to subclases? Shouldn't subclasses be using their
JK> own loggers?
JK> I would think that the following would be the best practice:
JK> final private static Logger logger = Logger.getLogger{MyClass.class.getName());
JK> Is this the case? I'm really just trying to get some validation here.
JK> Are there any disadvantages to the above?
JK> Thanks,
JK> Jake
--
Best regards,
Jacob mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
