Hi, There are always going to be difference between any two systems designed to do the same thing. Your system was obviously designed for your needs, and probably not much more. Log4j is designed to be generic, useful to a very broad range of people / applications, easily extensible, and yet fast.
At my organization, we carefully compared five or six in-house custom logging systems and a couple of 3rd party ones. We included very detailed performance comparisons and profilings. We found log4j to be as fast or faster than nearly all the other implementation, while providing the best range of features. As we need a lot of its features (JDBC logging, SMTP logging, runtime configurability, JMS logging, daily rolling, appender thresholds, object renderers, etc), we picked log4j, and have been very very happy since. So it's a question of what you need from your logging system. If your system did everything you need, you probably wouldn't even be considering log4j, right? ;) Maybe it';; easier to add just the features you need to your own system, instead of migrating to log4j completely? The point is, if you want to help tune log4j you're welcome to. It's open source and contributors are always welcome, right Ceki? ;) However, having used log4j in numerous apps from very small to very large, we've never had any complaints about its performance. There was always a lot of tuning to be done on our own apps before logging performance showed up as a blip on the profiler screen... Yoav Shapira Millennium ChemInformatics >-----Original Message----- >From: sk k [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2002 10:30 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Performance between Log4j and custom in-house logger > >Hi, > >We are planning to move from a custom in house logging >framework (MyLogger) to using Log4j and have been >doing some performance comparison between log4j and >MyLogger. > >The numbers seem to be favoring mylogger over log4j. > > >Sample Numbers >============== >Note: Timing includes logj startup time, mylogger >startup time and junitperf startup time. > >1) Logging 2 strings, each of size: 128bytes > >Request MyLogger(sec) Log4j(sec) >====== ======= ========= >100 1.22 1.29 >1000 1.67 1.71 >2000 2.12 2.01 > > > >2) Logging 4 strings, each of size: 128bytes > >Request MyLogger(sec) Log4j(sec) >====== ======= ========= >100 1.21 1.25 >1000 1.653 1.82 >2000 2.24 2.56 > > >3) Logging 8 strings, each of size: 128bytes > >Request MyLogger(sec) Log4j(sec) >====== ======= ========= >100 1.35 1.35 >400 1.56 1.71 >900 1.8 2.35 > >4) Logging 80 strings, each of size: 128bytes > >Request MyLogger(sec) Log4j(sec) >====== ======= ========= >100 1.251 1.7 >1000 1.81 6.1 >2000 2.15 11.2 > > >Sample code and configuration >=========================== >log4j.properties >============== >log4j.rootCategory=DEBUG,dest1 > >log4j.appender.dest1=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender >log4j.appender.dest1.layout=org.apache.log4j.SimpleLayout >log4j.appender.dest1.File=c:/skk/cps/logger/test/test1.log >log4j.appender.dest1.MaxFileSize=4MB >log4j.appender.dest1.MaxBackupIndex=60 > > >log4j.category.ut.log.Log4jPerfTest=DEBUG,dest2 >log4j.additivity.Log4jPerfTest=false >log4j.appender.dest2=org.apache.log4j.RollingFileAppender >log4j.appender.dest1.layout=org.apache.log4j.TTCCLayout > >log4j.appender.dest2.File=c:/skk/cps/logger/test/test.log >log4j.appender.dest2.MaxFileSize=4MB >log4j.appender.dest2.MaxBackupIndex=60 > >Test Logger code >=============== > >Note: logMsgs is an array with strings of size 128 >bytes. > > public void test_Log4j() throws Exception { > > int size = logMsgs.size(); > > for( int i=0; i<size; i++ ) { > log4jLogger.info( (String)logMsgs.get(i) >); > } > > } > >Some of my questions > >1) Is there anything that I can do to increase the >performance of log4j on my box( Pentium-3, 800Mhz, >512MB RAM) > >2) I see some architectural difference between the way >mylogger and log4j is implemented namely > My logger does formatting&writing to log file in a >background thread whereas it seems that log4j doesn't > seem do the same. Is this true. > My logger uses the concept of observer and >observable. > > >Thanks. > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes >http://finance.yahoo.com > >-- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user- >[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:log4j-user- >[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you.
-- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
