I second the praise for Chainsaw V2, nice job! On a related question - is it possible to create xml log files without the log4j: namespace prefix? Alternatively, what is the rationale for having an explicit namespace in the DTD?
Asking to remove the DOCTYPE declaration, IMHO, should then not necessitate a log4j: namespace prefix. Naresh Sikha -----Original Message----- From: Paul Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2004 4:59 PM To: 'Log4J Users List' Subject: RE: problem loading xml events to chainsaw > Been using chainsaw v2 for a couple of days - can't get > enough of it, I've introduced the rest of the team to it and > we're tidying up the logging in our application to get the > most benefit possible, but I'm having a problem loading xml > events from a file into chainsaw... > That's always nice to hear.. Thanks! I think you need to get rid of these lines from the file, IIRC (it's been a while): > <?xml version="1.0" ?> > <!DOCTYPE log4j:eventSet SYSTEM "log4j.dtd"> Chainsaw will automatically wrap them I think. Try it out anyway! :) BTW, 'soon' you will be able to browse directories for logging files to load, even from remote sources like ftp/sftp/http/ because of the wonders of Jakarta VFS (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/vfs/). I am hoping that VFS will event allow you to read these files even when they are in a compressed state (zip/tar etc). The VFSPlugin that I am working on is nowhere NEAR ready, but I'll let this list know when it's ready for the bleeding-edge users... cheers, Paul Smith --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]