>
> the log4j properties that you originally posted has nothing in it about
> jobManager; the output indicates that the one getting used does have
> settings for jobManager. Jacob has asked a question that may or may not be
> salient: are you sure the config file that is being loaded is the one you
> **think** is being loaded,


Yes. The log4j debug (I posted earlier) says so. I also said I tested
various other settings (like presentation/different levels) - and they all
work with my code, but not with HttpClient's.


> or has the log4j.properties morphed along the
> way, and the file getting used is indeed the one that think is being used?
>
> You indicated that you were going to grab a fresh commons-logging jar and
> use it. Did you, or did that step get lost in the shuffle?


I did. Did not help. Fyi, it was also 60KB+



-- 
Tomasz P.

Reply via email to