You misread the comment. The commentor basically told me the answer works with a minor change, and that he would mark the question as "done" if I would edit my answer (which I did).
So the answer works and seems to apply to your use case, no? The question is if it also works with custom levels. Sent from my iPhone > On 2015/08/26, at 8:49, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: > > Thanks. I checked out the link. It seems they were trying to do something > similar to me. I see the last comment on that is that it doesn't work. > > There is another post afterwards which uses the ThresholdFilter. However the > ThresholdFilter won't work as that allows, or denys, all levels greater than > or equal to or less than or equal to the level. I need to filter a specific > range of levels. > > Thanks, > Nick > >> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0900 >> Subject: Re: range filter? >> From: remko.po...@gmail.com >> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org >> >> Can you try something similar to this >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24695133/log4j2-filter-particular-level-in-apender/24697002#24697002 >> and see if that works with custom levels as well? >> >>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: >>> >>> I've tried a couple different combinations and so far no luck. Here's >>> the current configuration I tested with which doesn't work: >>> >>> <File ...> >>> <PatternLayout> >>> ... >>> </PatternLayout> >>> <Filters> >>> <ThresholdFilter level="INFO" onMatch="DENY"/> >>> <ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT"/> >>> </Filters> >>> </File> >>> >>> The >>> use case for why I want such a filter is to forward a range of events >>> to an appender. The threshold filter won't work because it will send >>> all events matching a certain level and lower to the appender. For >>> instance, I might want all DEBUG, TRACE and VERBOSE events going to one >>> appender. All INFO, ERROR and WARN events going to another appender. >>> All BUSINESS events (my custom) level, going to yet another appender. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Nick >>> >>>> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:44 -0700 >>>> Subject: Re: range filter? >>>> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com >>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> When you get it working, it sounds like it would make a nice addition to >>>> the FAQ with a description of your use case. >>>> >>>> Gary >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I believe two threshold filters inside a composite filter should should >>>>> work provided you have the onMatch and onMismatch set appropriately. >>>>> >>>>> Ralph >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm looking for a range filter in log4j2. I see there is on in >>> log4net >>>>> and it appears there was one written by someone for log4j 1. Just >>>>> wondering if there is something 'out of the box' in log4j2 that will >>>>> accomplish the same? I was wondering whether this could be >>> accomplished >>>>> with the CompositeFilter with two ThresholdFilter? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> Nick >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org >>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
