Why not? It would take about 10 minutes to implement. In fact, I am sure it 
would take more time to document it than to implement it.

Ralph

> On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:42 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I've got to say that I use MarkerFilters all the time, but I still need to
> refresh my brain when I've not used them in a while.
> 
> If providing a LevelRangeFilter would be less confusing, then perhaps we
> should write one.
> 
> Gary
> 
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
> 
>> Maybe.  However, I'm having a hard time following what the configuration
>> is saying and thus have no idea what I would need to put in the
>> configuration.  Here is a snippet from that post:
>> 
>>           <!-- Now deny warn, error and fatal messages -->
>> 
>>                      <ThresholdFilter level="warn"  onMatch="DENY"
>> onMismatch="NEUTRAL"/>
>> 
>>           <ThresholdFilter level="error" onMatch="DENY"
>> onMismatch="NEUTRAL"/>
>>           <ThresholdFilter level="fatal" onMatch="DENY"
>> onMismatch="NEUTRAL"/>
>> 
>>            <!-- This filter accepts info, warn, error, fatal and denies
>> debug/trace -->
>> 
>>            <ThresholdFilter level="info"  onMatch="ACCEPT"
>> onMismatch="DENY"/>
>> 
>> 
>> The top three seem as if they would deny warn, error and fatal, yet the
>> third says it accepts info, warn, error and fatal.  And while I understand
>> those in isolation, I think, I have no idea how the <filters> composite
>> would handle this.  Why are the first three needed?  How does the
>> CompositeFilter work?  Does it try to match on each filter in the list of
>> stop as soon as it gets a DENY?
>> 
>> What if I wanted to setup a filter which just accepted WARN?  And on top
>> of that ensure that if anyone defined any custom levels which are maybe
>> just 1 away from WARN in either direction that those don't make it in the
>> appender.  How would you do that?
>> 
>> How I did this with the log4net LevelRangeFilter was to set the levelMin
>> and levelMax to the same value.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Nick
>> 
>>> Subject: Re: range filter?
>>> From: remko.po...@gmail.com
>>> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 09:12:29 +0900
>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>> 
>>> You misread the comment. The commentor basically told me the answer
>> works with a minor change, and that he would mark the question as "done" if
>> I would edit my answer (which I did).
>>> 
>>> So the answer works and seems to apply to your use case, no? The
>> question is if it also works with custom levels.
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>> On 2015/08/26, at 8:49, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks.  I checked out the link.  It seems they were trying to do
>> something similar to me.  I see the last comment on that is that it doesn't
>> work.
>>>> 
>>>> There is another post afterwards which uses the ThresholdFilter.
>> However the ThresholdFilter won't work as that allows, or denys, all levels
>> greater than or equal to or less than or equal to the level.  I need to
>> filter a specific range of levels.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Nick
>>>> 
>>>>> Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 08:27:04 +0900
>>>>> Subject: Re: range filter?
>>>>> From: remko.po...@gmail.com
>>>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> Can you try something similar to this
>>>>> 
>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24695133/log4j2-filter-particular-level-in-apender/24697002#24697002
>>>>> and see if that works with custom levels as well?
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 6:04 AM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've tried a couple different combinations and so far no luck.
>> Here's
>>>>>> the current configuration I tested with which doesn't work:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> <File ...>
>>>>>> <PatternLayout>
>>>>>>     ...
>>>>>>  </PatternLayout>
>>>>>>  <Filters>
>>>>>>     <ThresholdFilter level="INFO" onMatch="DENY"/>
>>>>>>     <ThresholdFilter level="DEBUG" onMatch="ACCEPT"/>
>>>>>>  </Filters>
>>>>>> </File>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The
>>>>>> use case for why I want such a filter is to forward a range of events
>>>>>> to an appender.  The threshold filter won't work because it will send
>>>>>> all events matching a certain level and lower to the appender.  For
>>>>>> instance, I might want all DEBUG, TRACE and VERBOSE events going to
>> one
>>>>>> appender.  All INFO, ERROR and WARN events going to another appender.
>>>>>> All BUSINESS events (my custom) level, going to yet another appender.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 13:17:44 -0700
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: range filter?
>>>>>>> From: garydgreg...@gmail.com
>>>>>>> To: log4j-user@logging.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> When you get it working, it sounds like it would make a nice
>> addition to
>>>>>>> the FAQ with a description of your use case.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 1:11 PM, Ralph Goers <
>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I believe two threshold filters inside a composite filter should
>> should
>>>>>>>> work provided you have the onMatch and onMismatch set
>> appropriately.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 25, 2015, at 12:36 PM, Nicholas Duane <nic...@msn.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> I'm looking for a range filter in log4j2.  I see there is on in
>>>>>> log4net
>>>>>>>> and it appears there was one written by someone for log4j 1.  Just
>>>>>>>> wondering if there is something 'out of the box' in log4j2 that
>> will
>>>>>>>> accomplish the same?  I was wondering whether this could be
>>>>>> accomplished
>>>>>>>> with the CompositeFilter with two ThresholdFilter?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>>>>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to