Thanks Matt and Ralph,
I have extended ExtendedLoggerWrapper and it seems to work. Let’s hope I don’t
stumble against other peculiarities.
Thanks again!
Juan
> On 10 Sep 2016, at 21:44, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> If there's an easier way to do it, that'd be cool, but all the bridges in
> log4j itself use ExtendedLoggerWrapper as it is.
>
> On 10 September 2016 at 14:35, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, you use ExtendedLoggerWrapper and pass the fully qualified class name
>> of your wrapper class on the logMessage call. I seem to recall there is an
>> even easier way but it escapes me and I don’t see it documented on the web
>> site.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>> On Sep 10, 2016, at 12:06 PM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I should note that you might want to use ExtendedLoggerWrapper in this
>>> scenario as the methods are protected otherwise that I just mentioned.
>>>
>>> On 10 September 2016 at 14:03, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> When you make a custom Logger wrapper, you need to use the logMessage()
>>>> methods that include the fqcn string which should be the fully qualified
>>>> class name of the logger wrapper. See AbstractLogger for an example.
>>>>
>>>> On 10 September 2016 at 13:57, Juan Fuentes <
>> juanmarianofuen...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>>
>>>>> After spending half a day on this I have decide to try luck on the
>>>>> official mailing list, hopefully some dev can throw some light over
>> this.
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m trying to use a wrapper over a Logger object to restrict the
>> methods
>>>>> of the API to the ones on my interface, for example:
>>>>>
>>>>> class Log4JLogger implements com.opencms.core.logging.Logger {
>>>>>
>>>>> private Logger logger;
>>>>>
>>>>> public Log4JLogger(Logger logger) {
>>>>> this.logger = logger;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> @Override
>>>>> public void traceEntry(String message, Object... args) {
>>>>> this.logger.traceEntry(message, args);
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> If I combine this with a pattern that includes the line and the method
>>>>> name, for example:
>>>>> <PatternLayout pattern="%d{yyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss.SSS} %-5level %class{36}
>> %L
>>>>> %M - %msg%xEx%n"/>
>>>>>
>>>>> I get as result the line and method name on the wrapper, what makes
>>>>> sense, but is not what I want to. I want the ones from the class that
>> calls
>>>>> the wrapper.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any way to configure/specify this in any way?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would be also happy if I can just extend a Logger and implement my
>>>>> interface on it, but what logger should I extend? How can I create an
>>>>> instance of this custom logger afterwards?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>>> Juan
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
