Just to clarify: there seems to be a misconception about signed assemblies. A signed assembly runs just fine outside of the GAC, just as if it were a non-signed assembly.
On 6/21/06, Niall Daley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It seems we have several divergent requirements for signing; we need a non-signed version for non GAC installations, a version signed with a publicly available community key to allow separate components to use the same instance, and possibly a version signed with a non-public key coinciding with a release to match Microsoft's vision of an author signed assembly.
