Agree. Will the code be compatible with the current version?
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Miroslav Vanický <miroslav.vani...@vande.cz > wrote: > Logging to MSSQL would be nice! > > > On 19.8.2015 12:56, Javier Sanchez wrote: > > Agree! > El ago. 19, 2015 3:21 AM, <dpsen...@apache.org> escribió: > >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Last night I’ve dreamed a dream and in that dream the release process of >> log4net happened on a flick of a switch. Now that I’m awake again I find >> the idea most pleasing and thus I’m bringing this idea to the dev list [1]. >> >> >> >> My idea was that we should start off log4net2 “from scratch” that targets >> only .NET 4.0 [2] and does only what the largest part of people want from >> it: >> >> >> >> 1. Log to console >> >> 2. Log to file [3] >> >> >> >> What can also be discussed is if log4net2 should get an interface to the >> existing appenders. >> >> >> >> Please discuss! >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dominik >> >> >> >> [1] To make this come true there will be the need for a few helping hands >> and therefore this message goes to people that use log4net and want log4net >> to be revived. >> >> [2] With .NET 4.0 we would still support good old WinXP and that should >> really be enough for today’s technology. >> >> [3] Yes, with rolling and there shouldn’t be a thousand possible >> combinations of configuration options. Stability and speed goes over >> functionality. >> >> >> > > --
