Hmm I think notice file needs to include jquery refs, yes?
If so that's probably cause to re-rool an rc.
Scott
On Dec 17, 2011, at 2:25 AM, Ivan Habunek <[email protected]>
wrote:
On 17 December 2011 10:45, Christian Grobmeier <[email protected]>
wrote:
Whats meant is the LICENSE file needs to contain the MIT/GPL license:
http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#distributing-code-under-several-licenses
I think the LICENSE must containt the license of jquery and probably
even in the NOTICE file this must be mentioned:
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html#required-third-party-notices
Well, then I think we should go for RC2 at this point. This vote is
cancelled. A new one will begin ASAP.
I will fix LICENSE and the things you mentioned in the previous email.
Do you think that we should do anything about the warnings in the
rat report?
Best regards,
Ivan
