On Feb 19, 2008 11:28 AM, komfo,amonan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 19, 2008 10:12 AM, Michael Turniansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > [...] "ka'orelcimdyna'u" is
> >
> > parsed as "ka'o relcimdyna'u", the sumti "an imaginary amount of
> > complex numbers".
>
> Rather, the nonsensical "i complex numbers", where "i" is the quantifier.
Well, that's what I meant by "an imaginary amount". Not any
unspecfic amount, but specifically, an "i" amount of them. Just
wanted to save space typing, but now we had to waste three times the
amount of space :-)
>
> > [...] If you WANTED to add cmavo to a lujvo, you have to do it
> >
> > with the aid of "zei" ("lujvo glue") in between.
>
>
> This is true for "ka'o", but not for cmavo in general, as many cmavo have
> their own rafsi.
>
No, it's true for ANY cmavo. If you wanted to add a rafsi OF a
cmavo (if it has one), then you wouldn't need the zei. There, now the
imprecision is on the other foot. :-)
--gejyspa
