Ouch. Back to the drawing board then. Lots of stuff to correct and misunderstandings to restudy then.
ki'e rodo 2009/9/23 Jorge Llambías <jjllamb...@gmail.com>: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Michael Turniansky > <mturnian...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> We crossposted, but as I mentioned in my last note, the utterance >> _as a whole_ doesn't parse, because the li'u wasn't actually, elided, >> but existed at the end of the second paragraph. > > Officially, there was an elided first "li'u", forced by the second > selbri, and the "li'u" at the end was a second "li'u" unmatched with > any opening "lu", so at that point the utterance becomes > ungrammatical. In other words, the final "li'u" cannot force a > previously elided "li'u" to disappear. This is all very mesy, and I > don't think "li'u" should be elidable at all. > > mu'o mi'e xorxes > > > > -- “Nothing bothers me more than sloth. The objective is to fix mistakes of ambition and not make mistakes of sloth. I work my ass off.” -Tim Ferriss
