On 13 March 2010 16:26, Luke Bergen <lukeaber...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So you object to: >> >> mi viska lo nu lo nanmu cu bajra >> >> ? > Good point. I suppose I can't really object to that for practical reasons. > It just feels strange to me. I understand myself to be seeing a man who is > running as opposed to the event of running itself.
"a man" itself is an abstraction/event of e.g. atoms forming molecules forming cells forming a biological male body; an event of "man-ing". So, when you see "a man", you are already seeing an event. When "a man" "runs", it's a combination of events, just like the event of hydrogen & rubber forming a balloon and the event of the balloon going up can combine.