On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:40:00AM +0000, Michael Stevens wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 11:10:38AM +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
>> It's intended to be something you can give to designers. The reason I
>> like it is that it _doesn't_ have lots of "programmer"-type features;
>> which means that I can maintain just the scripts, and hive off the
>> template/HTML bits to someone else.
>In my experience of designers, HTML::Template would be too much for
>them.
I couldn't possibly comment on that.
>OTOH, I vaguely remember andy claiming that template toolkit stuff can
>be left to designers.
It's just a matter of where on the complexity scale you want to pick,
I think; I like H::T's loop structure (probably more than is entirely
healthy), so I don't use Text::Template, but I don't really want the
formatting that seems to be in TT.
R
