On Sun, Nov 26, 2000 at 04:23:04PM +0000, David Cantrell wrote: > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 07:15:51PM +0000, Dave Cross wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2000 at 06:38:09PM +0000, Michael Stevens ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > OTOH, this *could* get a little religious... > > What happened to: > > thou shalt use CGI.pm > I think that's where it starts to get religious :-) I think I was naive enough to consider that too obvious to bother stating.
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Michael Stevens
- Re: cgi coding guidelines James Powell
- Re: cgi coding guidelines robin
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Steve Mynott
- Re: cgi coding guidelines James Powell
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Robin Szemeti
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Struan Donald
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Dave Cross
- Re: cgi coding guidelines David Cantrell
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Steve Mynott
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Michael Stevens
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Piers Cawley
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Leon Brocard
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Piers Cawley
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Shevek
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Roger Burton West
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Mark Fowler
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Piers Cawley
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Roger Burton West
- Re: cgi coding guidelines David Cantrell
- Re: cgi coding guidelines Robin Szemeti
