On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 09:56:57PM +0000, Michael Stevens wrote: >Hey, that's an interesting statement. Maybe we should discuss it TO THE >DEATH, but not actually decide whether we agree or not. I'm not sure that we should, it's a bit of a blatant attempt to start a discussion don't you think? Roger (how many meta-levels can we get here?)
- Re: not-paranoia David Cantrell
- Re: not-paranoia Michael Stevens
- Re: not-paranoia Greg McCarroll
- Re: not-paranoia Michael Stevens
- Re: not-paranoia Greg McCarroll
- Re: not-paranoia Michael Stevens
- Re: not-paranoia Greg McCarroll
- Re: not-paranoia Michael Stevens
- Re: not-paranoia Roger Burton West
- Re: not-paranoia Robert Shiels
- Re: not-paranoia Greg McCarroll
- Re: not-paranoia Chris Devers
- Re: not-paranoia David H. Adler
- Re: not-paranoia Aaron Trevena
- Re: not-paranoia Dave Cross
