At 04:40 PM 20.3.2001 +0000, Simon Wilcox wrote: >At 16:29 20/03/2001 +0000, Jonathan Peterson wrote: >>> a) a two reasons why this module should never have been written, and >> >>1. It's redundant, other modules do this already. >>2. MM DD YY is an evil date format, and should be abolished >> in favour of DD MM YY which is more sensible. > >Or even better YY-MM-DD which avoids cross-pond confusion. And, as a bonus, is really easy to sort properly. -- Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Balding Badly-Coiffed Hackers (... Jonathan Stowe
- Re: Balding Badly-Coiffed H... David H. Adler
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Wilcox
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Alex Page
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Dave Cross
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. AEF
- ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Badly-Writt... Simon Wilcox
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... Dave Cross
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... AEF
- Re: ISO8601 [was] Re: Pointless, Bad... David Cantrell
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Chris Devers
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Batistoni
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Paul Mison
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Robinson
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Ian Brayshaw
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Matthew Byng-Maddick
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Simon Cozens
- RE: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Andrew Bowman
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. Philip Newton
- Re: Pointless, Badly-Written Module. David Cantrell