On Jun 09, David Cantrell wrote:
>
> So yes, the only reason for not allowing me to use it is incompetence on
> the part of whichever civil 'servants' were in charge of implementing it.
Out of interest, does anyone know if it's done "in-house" or contracted out?
(I strongly suspect the latter)
> This incompetence is further manifested in their choice of platform.
> even if I *could* use it, I wouldn't use it anyway, as I do not have
> sufficient confidence in the integrity of the server for such important
> information as my (eg) medical and tax data.
Err, why? What do you know about its implementation as opposed to any other
government website?
--
| Mark Hynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| "What are you trying to incinerate?" |
