On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 10:18:43AM +0000, Andrew Wilson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 09:40:55AM +0000, Roger Burton West wrote:
> > RFC2015. Microsoft has chosen not to implement it. > > I despise Microsofts crappy mailer, unfortunately I am forced to use it > in work. It doesn't do threading properly either. it's a steaming pile > of shite. Thinking of all the crap Microsoft's mailer has brought to us (all those lovely bandwidth-friendly e-mail worms) I was wondering: If the first e-mail worms had cc'ed <foo>@microsoft.com on every message they'd sent. (where <someone> was something not easily filterable) would MS have paid a bit more attention to security earlier on? I fear this may be a very dangerous meme: A worm that also mounts a denial of service attack on a single third party. Nicholas Clark -- EMCFT http://www.ccl4.org/~nick/CV.html
