On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jonathan Stowe wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Graham Seaman wrote: > > > > (curious as to why perl-ers are anti-XSL, and so, happy to let perl > > fall behind java... ;-) > > > > I'm not - for some reason I maintain XML::XSLT, I still think it looks > ugly though ... > Of course, I meant a general tone rather than specific people. Yes, it looks ugly and it's long-winded. Will be a lot better when it can use perl functions as well as javascript ones ;-) Does XML::XSLT support exslt functions ?
Graham