On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Jonathan Stowe wrote:

> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002, Graham Seaman wrote:
> >
> > (curious as to why perl-ers are  anti-XSL, and so, happy to let perl
> > fall behind java... ;-)
> >
> 
> I'm not - for some reason I maintain XML::XSLT, I still think it looks
> ugly though ...
> 
Of course, I meant a general tone rather than specific people. Yes, it
looks ugly and it's long-winded. Will be a lot better when it can use
perl functions as well as javascript ones ;-) Does XML::XSLT support
exslt functions ?

Graham


Reply via email to