On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, Simon Wistow wrote:
> Used them?
I've used Exporter::Simple. Like Exporter::Simple.
> If you're anything like me then you have some unexplained aversion to
> using them. No, I don't know why either. Why is that?
It introduces more dependancies. I can use Exporter::Simple, but I can
also just use Exporter.
Here (where I can control what people have installed) I use
Exporter::Simple. When I'm planning code that might see the light of day
outside I use plain Exporter. A little more code, but easier install for
my target audience.
Hmm.
This strikes me as stupid. Can I get Exporter::Simple to give me the code
it produces and spit that out for publication? Somewhat like using
Test::Inline doesn't actually require Test::Inline to be installed on the
other machine as I just run it once immediatly prior to shipping.
Of course, this makes it much harder for people who want to submit patches
to me...
Mark.
--
s'' Mark Fowler London.pm Bath.pm
http://www.twoshortplanks.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
';use Term'Cap;$t=Tgetent Term'Cap{};print$t->Tputs(cl);for$w(split/ +/
){for(0..30){$|=print$t->Tgoto(cm,$_,$y)." $w";select$k,$k,$k,.03}$y+=2}
