On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 02:35:32PM +0200, Newton, Philip wrote: > Natalie Ford wrote: > > I have put the photos from the last social meet on my colo at: > > http://www.natalie.ourshack.org/londonpm20020307/IMG007.jpg > > Is there any particular reason why IMG005 (with the lowest number) is the > newest of those pictures according to its file date and IMG037a (with the > highest numbers) is the oldest? All the other pictures have a file date in > the order of their number... that is IMG006 is the second-oldest file and > IMG034a is the second-newest, with all the others in between. > > It nearly looks as if IMG005 and IMG037a had their filenames switched.
No, the file names reflect the order they were taken in (with xxxa images being on the second film and nnn images being on the first) and scanned in but the file dates reflect the order i did the cropping and resaving. -- Natalie Ford .................................. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
