On Wed, 24 Apr 2002, David Cantrell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 09:31:02AM -0400, Chris Devers wrote: > > > I think Paul's points are valid though. Why make an aptitute test out > > of this? What's so great about software obscurity or pedantry? > > There's nothing good about obscurity, and little good about pedantry. > Luckily, majordomo's interface is not obscure.
...but you concede that it's pedantic? ;) > > Polemics aside, I see no benefit for it anymore. > > There's several excellent reasons to run majordomo. The biggest > reason for me is that I needed to have perl on the machine anyway > and had no other reason for installing python. That, and majordomo > was easier to set up. So, it was easier for you to install, but -- you seem to admit -- more pedantic for users to interact with, but you don't care so that's fine. Uhh, right. Can you maybe give some more compelling reasons than that? I still don't see the light here -- I still don't see why Majordomo is the right solution for Alex's needs. I still stick with the chorus: go with Mailman. It's Just Better. -- Chris Devers [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache / mod_perl / http://homepage.mac.com/chdevers/resume/ "More war soon. You know how it is." -- mnftiu.cc
