On Sunday, October 6, 2002, at 07:06 pm, Kate L Pugh wrote: >> I wanted a test that's like use_ok, but which fails if any warnings >> [...] come up during the 'use'. But I only wanted it
On Thu 10 Oct 2002, Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you can live with two tests (one for the successful use, one for > whether it caused warnings or not) you can use Test::Warn to produce > something quite readable. Excellent, thanks, that's exactly what I wanted. And it even catches failure to return true, which my thing didn't. Kake -- http://www.earth.li/~kake/cookery/ - vegan recipes, now with new search feature http://grault.net/grubstreet/ - the open-source guide to London http://www.penseroso.com/ - websites for the fine art and antique trade
