On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Andy Kelk wrote: > ISTR (although I can't find where now) that 0 is not valid for the > numeric parts. I am not 100% sure on that... > If so, you can't have E0 7PT but you can have E20 7PT. > Similarly, E4 7PT is valid but E4 0PT is not.
I can confirm that 0 is valid for the second numberic part, since I've lived in such a postcode (DY9 0JF). cheers, Adam. -- aca114
