On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 06:11:33PM +0200, Robin Berjon wrote: > Toby Corkindale wrote: > >Given XALAN java, XALAN C++, GNOME libXSLT, and Pure Perl XSLT, which > >would you > >choose to work with from Perl, and why? > > Xalan Java is slow, and to use it from Perl would require shelling out or > bridgin from Inline::Java, neither of which are nice. > > Xalan C isn't, to the best of my knowledge, bridged to Perl. So again, > shelling out or XS/Inline::C. Not nice.
http://search.cpan.org/author/EDPRATOMO/XML-Xalan-0.44/ It is supported directly; i don't know how well it works though. > "Pure Perl XSLT", aka XML::XSLT is incomplete and broken. And slow. Just > don't go there. > > XML::LibXSLT is fast and already bridged. It also probably has the highest > user-share. I'd call it your only solution. That's the one I have initially started using. So far so good; as everyone else seems to think it's a goer, I'll stick with it. Out of interest, does anyone know how it performs compared to the MS/IIS/XML combo? (Since a solution based upon that is basically the main competitor to my effort) thanks, Toby -- Turning and turning in the widening gyre The falcon cannot hear the falconer; Things fall apart, the centre cannot hold; Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world.
