-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

* Luis Campos de Carvalho <lechamps at terra.com.br> [2003-07-07 14:59]:
> Andy Wardley wrote:
> >Toby Corkindale wrote:
> >
> >>I'm not convinced Perl is the best language to implement such things.
> >
> >Why not?  Performance concerns or something else?
> >
> >That's a serious question by the way, not just me being provocative.
> 
>   I think that Perl is not that good on number crunshing.
>   Maybe you should look at fortran (old and good!) or some 
> number-crunshing-specialist tool.

You mean like PDL (pdl.perl.org)?

(darren)

- -- 
Reisner's Rule of Conceptual Inertia:
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/CcWHzsinjrVhZaoRAk42AJsFZke2Nql8V9iPRC4nnZ9J0eHrawCeOmZN
W1ZLRYrp0z0F1x30DSRPp7Q=
=QBGD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to