2008/12/4 Simon Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > David Cantrell wrote: >> >> And no, setting up yet another blog aggregator or yet another obscure >> site that occasionally publishes an article, those don't count. >> perlbuzz's existence hasn't fixed any problems. > > > So fixing use.perl is what we need to do. That will only happen with pudge's > active involvement.
Yeah but from what I'm reading between the lines part of the problem at least is that we are blogging and promoting inwardly on these kind of sites in the first place, we put in a lot of effort to talk to ourselves when we should be talking to the people who don't already read those sites: people shouldn't be blogging about Perl on use.perl they should be blogging about it elsewhere. /J\