Nigel Hamilton wrote: > but what TPF does > with "perl.com" is for them to decide - they are the rightful owners.
I really don't understand this argument at all. If anyone could lay a claim to perl.com, it's Larry himself (and I really don't see him doing that). But I don't understand why you think that TPF has a better claim to it than Tom. Perhaps you're assuming that TPF has a level of "officiality" (is that the right word?) that it doesn't have and (as far as I know) doesn't aspire to. Both Tom and O'Reilly have been very good for Perl. Without them I don' think that we'd be here having this conversation. If they make some money off the back of it, then I have no objections to that. Dave...
